Agile risk management methodology for decision-making in startup projects based on stock price forecasting

Authors

  • D. I. Uhryn Yuriy Fedkovych Chernivtsi National University
  • Yu.O. Ushenko Yuriy Fedkovych Chernivtsi National University
  • Yu.Ya. Tomka Yuriy Fedkovych Chernivtsi National University
  • S.V. Pavlov Vinnytsia National Technical University
  • M.V. Talah Yuriy Fedkovych Chernivtsi National University
  • L.I. Dyachenko Yuriy Fedkovych Chernivtsi National University
  • K.P. Gazdiuk Yuriy Fedkovych Chernivtsi National University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31649/1681-7893-2025-50-2-13-29

Keywords:

machine learning, financial fraud, anomaly prediction, ensemble methods, Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, XGBoost, transfer of technology, class imbalance, financial transactions

Abstract

The article is devoted to the topical problem of detecting fraudulent anomalies in financial transactions using machine learning methods. In the context of rapid digital transformation of financial systems and growth in transaction volumes, traditional methods of fraud detection are becoming ineffective, which highlights the urgent need to implement automated and adaptive solutions. The research is based on a step-by-step approach that includes data preparation and processing, building and training classification models, and evaluating their effectiveness. A comparative analysis of seven popular machine learning algorithms was conducted: linear regression, decision trees, random forest, neural networks, gradient boosting, XGBoost, and SVC. The key findings of the study showed that ensemble methods demonstrate the highest effectiveness in detecting fraud: Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, and XGBoost proved to be the most suitable for fraud detection tasks, demonstrating consistently high results. This is especially important given the typical class imbalance (a small number of fraudulent transactions compared to legitimate ones) in real financial data. The effectiveness of the models significantly outperforms the other algorithms considered, indicating their ability to detect complex, non-obvious patterns in the data. The critical importance of correctly configuring model hyperparameters and accounting for class imbalance to achieve maximum accuracy and completeness in detecting fraudulent transactions has been confirmed. This avoids overfitting on the dominant class and increases the system's sensitivity to rare but important fraudulent cases. The practical significance of the study lies in the fact that the proposed approach allows financial institutions to significantly improve operational efficiency, minimize financial losses, and strengthen customer trust. The implementation of such systems provides comprehensive and adaptive protection of the financial system in today's dynamic digital environment. The results of the study confirm the effectiveness of machine learning as a powerful tool for combating financial fraud.

Author Biographies

D. I. Uhryn, Yuriy Fedkovych Chernivtsi National University

доктор технічних наук, професор, доцент кафедри комп’ютерних наук

Yu.O. Ushenko, Yuriy Fedkovych Chernivtsi National University

доктор фізико-математичних наук, професор, завідувач кафедри комп’ютерних наук

Yu.Ya. Tomka, Yuriy Fedkovych Chernivtsi National University

кандидат фізико-математичних наук, доцент кафедри комп’ютерних наук

S.V. Pavlov, Vinnytsia National Technical University

д.т.н., професор кафедри біомедичної інженерії та оптикоелектронних систем

M.V. Talah, Yuriy Fedkovych Chernivtsi National University

кандидат біологічних наук, доцент кафедри комп’ютерних наук

L.I. Dyachenko, Yuriy Fedkovych Chernivtsi National University

кандидат технічних наук, доцент кафедри програмного забезпечення комп’ютерних систем

K.P. Gazdiuk, Yuriy Fedkovych Chernivtsi National University

доктор філософії, доцент, завідувач кафедри програмного забезпечення комп’ютерних систем

References

Zhou, Y., Shu, K., Liu, H. (2021). Detecting fraud in online transactions using machine learning: A review. ACM Computing Surveys, 54(1), 1–36.

Ngai, E. W. T., Hu, Y., Wong, Y. H., Chen, Y., Sun, X. (2011). The application of data mining techniques in financial fraud detection: A classification framework and an academic review of literature. Decision Support Systems, 50(3), 559–569.

Bhattacharyya, S., Jha, S., Tharakunnel, K., Westland, J. C. (2011). Data mining for credit card fraud: A comparative study. Decision Support Systems, 50(3), 602–613.

Jurgovsky, J., Granitzer, G., Ziegler, K., Calabretto, S., Portier, P. (2018). Sequence classification for credit-card fraud detection. Expert Systems with Applications, 100, 234–245.

Whitrow, C., Hand, D. J., Juszczak, P., Weston, D., Adams, N. M. (2009). Transaction aggregation as a strategy for credit card fraud detection. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 18(1), 30–55.

Chen, Y., Xu, X., Liu, J., Hu, J. (2020). Blockchain-based financial fraud detection: A review. IEEE Access, 8, 111697–111707.

Phua, C., Lee, V., Smith, K., Gayler, R. (2010). A comprehensive survey of data mining-based fraud detection research. arXiv preprint arXiv:1009.6119 [Electronic resource]. Access mode: https://arxiv.org/abs/1009.6119

Bauder, R., Khoshgoftaar, T. M. (2021). The effects of varying class distribution on learner behavior for medicare fraud detection with imbalanced big data. Health Information Science and Systems, 9(1), 1–15.

Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (ACFE). (2022). Report to the Nations: 2022 Global Study on Occupational Fraud and Abuse. Austin, Texas: ACFE. 80 с. [Electronic resource]. Access mode: https://www.acfe.com/report-to-the-nations/2022/

PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC). (2023). Global Economic Crime and Fraud Survey 2023. 44 с. [Electronic resource]. Access mode: https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/services/forensics/economic-crime-survey.html

International Monetary Fund (IMF). Fraud in Financial Institutions [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: https://www.imf.org/external/index.htm.

Scikit-learn Documentation. Machine Learning in Python [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: https://scikit-learn.org/stable/documentation.html.

XGBoost Documentation. Extreme Gradient Boosting [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: https://xgboost.readthedocs.io/.

Google AI Blog. Fighting Fraud with Machine Learning [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: https://ai.googleblog.com/.

Kaggle. Fraud Detection Datasets [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: https://www.kaggle.com/.

Bishop, C. M. Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9780387310732.

Міністерство фінансів України. Фінансова безпека [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: https://mof.gov.ua/uk/.

Financial Times. Combating Financial Fraud with AI [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: https://www.ft.com/.

International Journal of Financial Studies. AI in Fraud Detection [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: https://www.mdpi.com/journal/ijfs.

Visa Inc. Fraud Prevention with Advanced Analytics [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: https://usa.visa.com/.

Downloads

Abstract views: 88

Published

2026-01-12

How to Cite

[1]
D. I. Uhryn, “Agile risk management methodology for decision-making in startup projects based on stock price forecasting”, Опт-ел. інф-енерг. техн., vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 13–29, Jan. 2026.

Issue

Section

Principal Concepts and Structural Approaches to the Three-Level System of Specialist Training

Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 6 > >>